Global Supply Chain Network for Sustainability
Saturday, 22 June 2013
1.
Introduction
1.1 Supply Chain Sustainability – Definition:
Supply chain sustainability is the management
of environmental, social and economic impacts, and the encouragement of good
governance practices, throughout the lifecycles of goods and services. The
objective of supply chain sustainability is to create, protect and grow
long-term environmental, social and economic value for all stakeholders
involved in bringing products and services to market. By integrating the UN
Global Compact principles into supply chain relationships, companies can
advance corporate sustainability and promote broader sustainable development
objectives.
1.2 Importance of Supply Chain Sustainability:
There are numerous reasons why companies
start a supply chain sustainability journey. Primary among them is to ensure
compliance with laws and regulations and to adhere to and support international
principles for sustainable business conduct. In addition, companies are
increasingly taking actions that result in better social, economic and environmental
impacts because society expects this and because there are business benefits to
doing so. By managing and seeking to improve environmental, social and economic
performance and good governance through- out supply chains, companies act in
their own interests, the interests of their stakeholders and the interests of
society at large.
•
A
sustainable supply chain is one that includes measures of profit and loss as
well as social and environmental dimensions (Carter and Rogers 2008; Linton,
Klassen, and Jayaraman 2007).
•
Such
a conceptualization has been referred to as the triple bottom line of
financial, social, and environmental performance (Elkington 1994, 1998;
Kleindorfer, Singhal, and Wassenhove 2005).
1.3 Developing sustainable global supply
chains: three steps
To develop new supply chains or improve
existing ones, executives must think at a number of levels. First, consider the
big picture: what is motivating change in your business? What are the
opportunities and risks? Once your motivations are clear, identify the levers
that will increase your odds of success. Finally, put in place practices that
will help you realize your desired outcomes.
1.3.1
Identify Motivators: the 5C’s Framework
of Motivation
There are many reasons to address social
and environmental issues in your supply chain. Understanding these issues will
enable you to set goals and prioritize practices. The chart below lists the
reasons cited by research, which align with five key areas:
1. Customers:
access, attraction, retention, reputation, brand
2. Compliance:
regulation, social pressure
3. Costs:
efficiency, productivity, risk management
4. Competitive
Advantage
5. Conscience:
moral obligation, values
1.3.2
Assess Levers: the 7P’s Framework of
Levers
Seven key
levers can facilitate or inhibit your efforts to build a sustainable supply
chain. Evaluate these levers to determine if you have influence over them and
how to work with them.
Examples
of each are given below (the italicized examples appear most often in the
literature).
INTERNAL LEVERS
Purpose:
alignment
of sustainability with organizational strategy, history of CSR in the organization.
Policy:
clear
policy statements/codes of conduct, widely
communicated policies, financial resources, training and workshops, incentives,
transparent and measured outcomes.
People:
leadership/management
support, supportive
organizational culture, change agents, staff with strong personal commitments
and capabilities.
EXTERNAL LEVERS
Peers:
industry
collaboration.
Partners:
trust
in supplier engagement, dialogue
with suppliers, long-term relationships with suppliers, third-party
certification, shared vision with suppliers, experience sharing with suppliers,
investment in suppliers, incentives in supply relationships, collaboration with
suppliers.
Public
policy: supportive
regulation.
Power:
organizational size,
power over suppliers.
1.3.3
Improve Practices: Baseline Practices
Framework for Sustainable Supply Chains
The following figure shows the four most
prevalent practices in the literature for building sustainable supply chains:
1) Establishing a Code of Conduct; 2) Obtaining Third-Party Certifications; 3)
Selecting Suppliers; 4) Monitoring Suppliers*. We consider these the ‘baseline’
practices that all organizations should embrace. These practices reflect a
‘command and control’ approach to supply chain management, in which the lead
buying company dictates most rules and processes.
1.4 Motivation
Globalization has profoundly affected how
companies are managed strategically and operationally.
Considering the environmental issues such
as waste and emissions reduction, recycling, product design, and recovery and
the social issues such as child labor, working conditions, bribery and
corruption, there is seemingly no end to the complexity.
“Globalization + Public
concern about social and environmental issues
= Increased complexity in
managing supply chains”
2
Literature Review
Sustainable Supply Chain (SSC) is one of
the main efforts to integrate the three dimensions of environmental, economical
and social with supply chain management systems. This study conducts a
Bibliometric analysis of the field by collecting data with respect to following
parameters:
•
Source:
Web of Knowledge
•
Topic
Search: Sustainable Supply Chain
•
Time
Span: Latest 5 Years
•
Language:
English
•
Outcome:
541 papers
Productivity
of Journals and Authors:
Productivity simply indicates a number of
papers published by authors or in journals in certain duration.
During last five years, IJPE, JCP, SCMIJ, IJLCA,
BSE and IJPR are the most productive journals publishing Sustainable supply
chain papers, as shown in table below:
Source
Titles
|
Record Count
|
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS
|
27
|
JOURNAL OF CLEANER
PRODUCTION
|
26
|
SUPPLY CHAIN
MANAGEMENT AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
|
18
|
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT
|
15
|
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND
THE ENVIRONMENT
|
12
|
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
|
11
|
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
|
10
|
BIOMASS BIOENERGY
|
9
|
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF
OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
|
9
|
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY
CHAIN MANAGEMENT
|
9
|
COMPUTERS CHEMICAL
ENGINEERING
|
8
|
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
|
8
|
ENERGY POLICY
|
7
|
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS
ETHICS
|
7
|
PRODUCTION PLANNING CONTROL
|
7
|
As shown in table below, Seuring, S is the most
productive researcher. He has published 8 papers. Guillen-Gosalbez, G is the second productive researcher with 7 papers.
Sarkis, J and Walker, H have also shown productive performance.
Authors
|
Record Count
|
SEURING,
S
|
8
|
GUILLEN-GOSALBEZ,
G
|
7
|
SARKIS,
J
|
6
|
WALKER,
H
|
6
|
KLASSEN,
RD
|
5
|
VACHON,
S
|
5
|
VERMEULEN,
WJV
|
5
|
BEZZO, F
|
4
|
BLOEMHOF,
J
|
4
|
GIAROLA,
S
|
4
|
GUNASEKARAN,
A
|
4
|
JIMENEZ,
L
|
4
|
KOH,
SCL
|
4
|
KRAVANJA,
Z
|
4
|
LENZEN,
M
|
4
|
PREUSS,
L
|
4
|
WU, ZH
|
4
|
As per Web of Science Categories;
Management, Environmental Sciences, Operations Research Management Science,
Business, Engineering Environmental and Engineering Manufacturing constitute
major portion of the work done in area of sustainable supply chain and the
respective proportion has been shown in figure below.
There has been dramatic increase in sustainable
supply chain publications in Web of knowledge to date, as shown in figure
below.
Hence SWOT analysis of area of sustainable supply chain has
been formulated in table below on basis of three dimensions viz. economical,
environmental and social.
Strengths
•
Ability
to produce higher value-added products with greater emphasis on Health and
Safety.
•
Good
relationships with local communities as well as government and enforcing
bodies.
•
Possibility
to offset CO2 emissions.
|
Weaknesses
•
Lack
of formalized environmental management systems.
•
Emphasis
on quantity rather than provision of value added products and services.
•
Limited
understanding of the corporate sustainability concept and potential benefits.
•
Insufficient
internal communication.
|
Opportunities
•
Identifying
inefficiencies and improving financial and environmental performance through
self assessment and monitoring.
•
Improving
internal and external communication.
•
Improving
public relations while attracting and retaining good quality people.
|
Threats
•
Continued
lack of understanding of key sustainability issues resulting in inability to
respond to government and other initiatives on sustainability.
•
Increasingly
strict policies.
•
Lack
of data on sustainability parameters makes the company more open to
criticism.
|
Finally,
objectives for sustainability study have been proposed in generalized form
which can be undertaken at any level in order to achieve sustainability:
•
To
increase social and economic contribution to society by improving employment
opportunities.
• To
increase the utilization of resources with minimized impact on environment in
form of reduced greenhouse gases emission.
•
To
provide safe and healthy work environment to employees and other stakeholders.
3
Problem Environment
– “GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES”
3.1
Introduction
Garlock Group of companies is acknowledged as the
global leader in high-performance fluid sealing products for the world’s processing
industries. These include chemicals and petrochemicals, refining, pulp and
paper, power generation, semiconductor, primary metals, food and
pharmaceuticals, mining and original equipment manufacturers, among others.
Garlock Founded by Olin Judson Garlock in 1887,
Palmyra, NY in USA and now it became global organization with 16 global
operations employing more than 2000 people and a distributor network that
covers 80 countries. Garlock has 12 manufacturing facilities in the U.S.,
Canada, Europe, Asia and Latin America collectively produce the broadest range
of over 100,000 high-performance fluid sealing products like Gaskets, Expansion
Joints, Klozure Seals & Bearing Isolators, Butterfly Valves etc which are
designed specifically for industrial applications.
3.2 Sustainable Business Model
Garlock India is 100 % subsidiary of
Garlock USA and a marketing and servicing company of Garlock in India. This company plays down steam part in total
supply chain. Garlock India gets products from 12 different manufacturing
facilities located in the U.S., Canada,
Europe, Asia and Latin America for the Industrial customers located in wide
spread parts in India. There are all 3 flows of supply chain material, cash and
Information flow occurs. Garlock India
was facing some issues in their supply as listed below.
3.3 Issues in Supply Chain
3.3.1 Complex Supply Chain: As Garlock India gets Material from Manufacturing Locations in 12
different countries and supply to Industrial customers in India this makes
entire supply chain very complex. As this is cross boundary business activity,
there were other issues Communication Gap in Order Processing, Wrong Material
Supply from Plants, and stringent MOQ of the plant etc. exist in supply chain.
3.3.2 Financial Issues: Fluctuations in Foreign Currency Value
like Dollar, Euro price hike is major financial issue for Garlock India. As
small fluctuation in basic price will make impact on landed price due to
increase in Import duty, Transportation cost etc. Also various Inco terms of
different countries is also big issue.
3.3.3 Logistics Issues: One of major
issues is logistic for Garlock India. In custom, some time custom officer
doesn’t know about category in which these customized items falls. Hence he
charge wrong, Excise, Custom
Duties etc. Also sometimes material lost in the custom. Also estimation of
freight charge for customized items during offer stage is very unpredictable
some times.
As Garlock India deals in products for
plant maintenance, their Industrial customers can not afford long delivery
period. These customers situated in different states in India, there are
several logistic formalities like Road Permit, Octroi etc. and sometimes
Freight Forwarders unable to find correct address or they dispatch at Wrong
Dispatch. Consignment Tracking is very problematic sometimes.
3.4 Steps
towards sustainable supply chain:
Garlock India was facing issues in their
supply chain. Company took few corrective actions which lead their supply chain
towards the sustainability.
3.4.1 Scheduling
of dispatches: Earlier
Garlock’s manufacturing units made dispatches in single lots just on product
readiness which was huge loss in transportation and all import procedures had
to follow for every single which was wastage. Garlock India asked manufacturing
plants for order consolidation and to make dispatches on single day in every
week.
3.4.2 Reducing Transportation Cost: Consolidation of order and arrange all
materials in single Shipment helps in reducing transportation cost. Also they
start Importing by Sea for regular stock items instead of Air.
3.4.3 Online Tools:
Garlock India launched online tools for Shipment Tracking. Customer can
get dispatch information and waybill just by putting purchase order no in
Garlock website. Also their manufacturing
facilities launched web applications for having looked at Inventory. This is
very helpful for Garlock India to pass on correct Information to the customers.
3.4.4 Resolving Logistics Issues: Material Insured for any lost in
logistic; Timely Information exchange; All the requisite details during offer
stage.
3.4.5 Reduced delivery Time: Keeping stocks of Semi finished goods
and Keeping stocks of goods for regular customers by judging their consumption
patterns.
3.4.6 Regular Interaction with the Customers: Knowing their future requirements.
4
Real Life Examples
While at one time addressing these social
and environmental issues might have just been ‘nice to do,’ that is no longer
the case. Companies that fail to manage such issues expose themselves to both operational
and reputational risk. For example:
• Nike was publicly accused of using
child labor in offshore factories in 1996. This criticism endured until 1998
when Nike’s CEO announced significant, long-term measures to improve working
conditions at supplier factories.
• Mattel was forced to recall US$100
million worth of product when one supplier used lead-contaminated paint on the
company’s toys in 2007. The company watched its stock price fall 18% in the
months that followed and has since been the target of litigation.
• Apple faced renewed criticism in 2011
for both possible environmental indiscretions and a lack of transparency in its
supply chain. Apple had previously admitted that in 2008 half of its suppliers’
factories for key products including iPhones and iPads weren’t paying valid overtime,
one quarter weren’t paying workers minimum wage, and one quarter failed to meet
environmental standards. Time will tell if such issues will permanently tarnish
Apple’s ‘clean’ image.
5
Conclusion
The field of sustainable supply chain is
fresh area and there is vast scope to work further addressing key issues in
above mentioned three dimensions viz economic, environment and social.
6
References
• Carter,
C. R. and D. S. Rogers. 2008. A framework of sustainable supply chain
management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical
Distribution and Logistics Management 38 (5): 360ñ387.
• Elkington,
J. 1994.Toward the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for
sustainable development. California Management Review 36 (2): 90ñ100.
• Elkington,
J. 1998. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century. New
Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, British Columbia.
• Kleindorfer,
P. R., K. Singhal, and L. N. V. Wassenhove. 2005. Sustainable operations
management. Production and Operations Management 14 (4): 482ñ492.
• Linton,
J. D., R. Klassen, and V. Jayaraman. 2007. Sustainable supply chains: An
introduction. Journal of Operations Management 25 (6): 1075ñ1082.
• www.webofknowledge.com
• www.nbs.net/knowledge/supply-chains
0 comments:
Post a Comment